On Aug 7, 6:57 pm, Maciej Katafiasz <[email protected]> wrote: > What happened to the flag specifying if the store supports full-text > searches? It used to be there.
I can't remember such a flag, but that doesn't mean it hasn't been there at some time... > Also, I'm beginning to believe that the store abstraction needs to be > a lot more sophisticated in what it provides querying-wise, we used to > run into mismatches that'd result in turning SQL-able queries into > looping over results in the Lisp code all the time in the cl-perec > backend (which is, before you ask, scrapped for the time being, due to > it making us fight on two fronts and consequently progressing on none. > We might resurrect it when the logic is correct, and when we have a > reasonable idea of how we want it to operate, exactly). Yes, the store abstraction level needs to be refined. Besides your Perec backend a query interface would also benefit the Elephant and SQL stores. > I think a store-agnostic query compiler > would be in order (maybe something could be stolen from Perec > itself?), then simple stores could continue to be simple and function > with the Lisp-side processing, but real DB interfaces could implement > a more sophisticated language, as they have the means to support it. A very interesting idea, let's keep it in mind until everyone has a bit more time on their hands. I'd like to encourage you to file a ticket on the Bitbucket tracker so we don't forget. Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
