John Fremlin wrote:
> The tpd2 benchmark (11k requests/second) was for a full connection open > and closing (not a persistent connection which tends to crash > apachebench) with tpd2 on one core of my laptop and apachebench on the > other core. Although the page was small, it was dynamic and a complete > page. So why is it faster than Hunchentoot by a factor of about 100? > Weblocks really needs someone to work full time on it to develop its > great potential and mucking about with the low-level stuff isn't the > first thing to do -- shame there's no funding for it, Yeah, people hardly fund or contribute to libraries in substantial ways, they just use them. > but I guess someone needs to invest the time in documenting it before > the imaginary megacorps start contributing to the Weblocks > Foundation(tm) ;-) I think you're on a completely wrong path here, for two reasons. :) Reason one being that there aren't even enough people taking a look at Weblocks (or considering Common Lisp at all) right now to say "documentation is insufficient". Least some megacorp or well-funded startup. Reason two is that a corp with some financial backing could well just invest hiring me (or someone else who's capable) a month just for writing complete docs and that would be it. Leslie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
