On Sep 20, 11:30 am, "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I recommend using clbuild for Weblocks development.
Looks like what gentoo portege is trying to do, but of course it's
difficult to qualify so many packages. It seems like there are some
missing dependencies and problems with clbuild as well:
./clbuild install weblocks cl-previalence
./clbuild lisp --eval "(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :weblocks-demo)"
component :TRIVIAL-TIMEOUT not found, required
by
./clbuild install trivial-timeout
./clbuild lisp --eval "(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :weblocks-demo)"
component :SALZA2 not found, required
by
./clbuild install salza2
./clbuild lisp --eval "(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op :weblocks-demo)"
component :FARE-MATCHER not found, required by
./clbuild install fare-matcher
The following extra dependencies were found: fare-utils
include dependencies in update? (Y/n)
UPDATE wget fare-matcher
Finished getting.
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
No changes!
Pushing to "/home/petter/lisp/clbuild-test/clbuild/source/fare-
matcher"...
No recorded local changes to push!
UPDATE wget fare-utils
Finished getting.
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
No changes!
Petter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
