Thank you for reply. Hovewer I have two additional questions. 1) Did the issue described in http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02014.html is fixed in current weblocks releases? I just use own-made installation script which places systems sources in /usr/share/common- lisp/systems/ as root and this approach is not working with weblocks which is creates files inside its own sources directory (but should place them in some temporary one.
2) I'm writting a server which uses hunchentoot for receiving client data via http/post (client is a software agent on smartphone). When I start working with weblocks it kills my easy handler in hunchentoot. Is there a possibility to bind weblocks responce only to single web- path preserving all other http-handlers without deep diving into weblocks internals? On 9 фев, 18:44, "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ababo, > > the demo underwent some redesign a few months ago and the > screenshots show the previous style. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
