On Jun 29, 10:05 pm, Nandan Bagchee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Which point in particular? I have found #3 to be quite critical in some > cases (fewer compiler warnings, runs faster) though I don't know the precise > reason for it. > > I've got a fasl clearing step in my build script as a result. I suppose it was #2. After I had changed cl-cont, for some reason the old binaries were still being referenced. Removing all the binaries helped. I could be missing something because I'm not sure I understand what you are saying about #3. All that operation is doing is loading the files (compiling them if they already aren't). The files from cl-cont will have to be loaded anyway because they are in the dependency path for weblocks ........ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
