I have both Win XP and an LW Pro license (as well as an interest in Quicklisp). What exactly would you like tested?
Cheers. On Sep 3, 11:32 pm, nunb <[email protected]> wrote: > The quicklisp demo movie[1] demonstrates an installer that only > requires a CL to run (does not assume unixisms). > > Could someone test this on Windows? The persistent problems there have > been threading support on sbcl (ccl, LW etc seem fine) and asdf's > symlink-oriented approach. > > [1]http://is.gd/eU9qb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
