petter wrote: > > On Oct 22, 3:28 pm, "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The results suggest that Quicklisp is (indirectly) responsible. > > That made me a little curios... How was it responsible? Isn't > Quicklisp only involved when downloading the systems and building > them?
I'm not familiar with Quicklisp, but the profiling results show that it is also involved in finding installed systems. Leslie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
