On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Metacraft <[email protected]> wrote:

> I need to know the current status of weblocks + clsql status as of
> March/April 2012 with respect to fluid/multi-threading?
>

I am using Weblocks and CLSQL in an app that is... well, not quite in
production use yet, but will be in a few weeks.  I haven't tried the demo
in a long time, and don't recall what state it's in, but my app seems to be
working fine.

There are some useful patches in my public Weblocks repo, which I don't
think have been merged into the official one yet.  Take a look:
https://github.com/slburson/weblocks


> I have read about all of the dozens of the forum articles and page
> that I could search on this topic. But there is no clear conclusion
> (the discussion about clsql vs fluid regarding thread safety is one or
> two years old). Then there are recommendations from CLSQL site about
> not using fluid. Is there a version of weblocks mysql store that is
> thread-safe and works (with or without fluid)?
>

I've only tested my app under light load yet, but as far as I can tell, it
is thread-safe (I am using CLSQL-Fluid).  It definitely was not thread-safe
when I was not using CLSQL-Fluid -- I thought I had an alternative approach
that would work, but it didn't.  I definitely recommend using CLSQL-Fluid.
I think the objections to it are mistaken.

Oh, I am using Postgres rather than MySQL, so I can't be so sure the latter
works, but I don't know any reason it wouldn't.

-- Scott

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.

Reply via email to