I would be in support of that idea. This way new ideas get to be explored without polluting the main project for those that would like to see those ideas continue.
I would like to volunteer for the graphic design aspects of the project. You will probably want to start the project with a standard cms of some sort, eventually the project should eat it's own dog food. Let me know if I can be of assistance. R. On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Leslie P. Polzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your comments! > > It appears that the best way to go about my radical changes > would be a dedicated fork of Weblocks, or a project that carries > a new name and shares only its roots with Weblocks. > > Some parts like a client-oriented test suite might be shared by > both projects, but in general they should be separate. > > This is good for backwards compatibility as well, and the new > project doesn't have to care about that so there's all the freedom > that is needed to design and develop it. > > Leslie > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "weblocks" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/weblocks/-/avYX902pfGcJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
