On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:04 AM, o_z <[email protected]> wrote:
> What environment you use for asdf ? I've upgraded quicklisp to latest
> version and all is ok (I use sbcl and suppose you too).
>
I'm using the latest ASDF from git, currently 2.26.146.
http://common-lisp.net/gitweb?p=projects/asdf/asdf.git

—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual
rights, cannot claim to be defenders of minorities. — Ayn Rand


>> recent failures of ASDF 2.26.36 to compile weblocks led me to give a look
>> at your .asd files.
>>
>> In the end, I improved backwards compatibility, and I believe that the
>> latest ASDF (currenty 2.26.45) will compile weblocks. Please test, though.
>>
>> However, while I was at it, I made those small improvements to your .asd
>> files.
>>
>> Also, I don't quite understand what is the intent of the
>> prepare-prevalence-op thingie. How is it not but a horribly inefficient way
>> to do the same as including :weblocks-memory in your :depends-on?
>>
>> I would also cut on all the defpackage overhead when all you're doing is
>> using a single defsystem form. ASDF will load your systems in a package
>> where defsystem already works, for lambda's sake!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to