On Feb 19, 2013, at 1:30 AM, Paul Hoadley <pa...@logicsquad.net> wrote:

> On 19/02/2013, at 10:23 AM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:
> 
>> Le 2013-02-18 à 18:47, Paul Hoadley <pa...@logicsquad.net> a écrit :
>> 
>>> I think they're just different.  The instructions here:
>>> 
>>> http://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/documentation/Deploying+on+Amazon+EC2
>>> 
>>> are about being able to bring an appserver up from scratch using scripts.  
>>> Eyeballing that page right now, it might be a little incomplete and/or 
>>> light on detail, but it's certainly an approach I like, for what that's 
>>> worth.  With a bit of effort, you can turn wo-install.sh into something 
>>> just right for your own purposes—we've evolved it into something that 
>>> allows us to bring up an appserver on a new instance with a single local 
>>> command without even needing to log in.
>> 
>> What are the advantages of doing this over building a template or a AMI?
> 
> They're just different points along a bootstrapping spectrum.  WOlastic was 
> way up the pre-baked end, where (if I recall correctly—I never tried it) the 
> idea was you'd fire up an instance from the WOlastic AMI and you'd be 
> essentially ready to go.  This gives basically no flexibility (all the myriad 
> arbitrary choices are fixed in the AMI), and would require creating a new AMI 
> for every software upgrade or security fix you wanted to make.  Your approach 
> with packages is somewhere in the middle, though I presume you'll 
> periodically find yourself needing to update those packages as well.  And 
> then the scripted approach is heading towards the other end, starting with a 
> vanilla AMI like Amazon Linux, and adding all the pieces on the fly, 
> including grabbing the latest wotaskd and JavaMonitor from the community 
> build server.  There are trade-offs at every move along the spectrum, and 
> whether you see them as advantages or disadvantages will depend on your 
> particular business case.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Paul Hoadley
> http://logicsquad.net/

Would there be merit to the community supporting a public WebObjects AMI?
There's a small cost (which I've not estimated), but if we had an AMI, I could 
play instead of work for two hours today!
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-deploy mailing list      (Webobjects-deploy@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-deploy/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to