I admit I did not read the PDF (too early in the morning for a nap)
but the way I read the text on the first page, this seems to be for
people who want to ship WebObjects along with their application,
instead of telling their customers to install a copy themselves. So
the assumption is that you are passing this cost on to your customer
in return for an easier installation experience for them.
Also, I wonder if they see this as a solution to the "I don't want to
make my clients buy an X Server" thing we've all been whining about?
If your application includes all the WO pieces needed for deployment,
and you can get a license key from Apple to give to your customer,
this is a relatively easy solution as long as WO keeps on working on
other platforms. Certainly it would make a better impression than
giving your customer an OS X Server box and telling them that's where
the license key comes from and they have to keep it....
janine
On Oct 11, 2005, at 12:56 AM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 11.10.2005 um 08:51 schrieb LD:
Section 3.1 clarifies this further...
We seem to have vastly different views what "clarifies" means:)
So, in a nutshell: you're expected to pay x * $699 to not have x
boxes of OSX server (each for $499) around?
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/womail%40mac.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
