As of WebObjects 5.3, WebObjects Builder uses Webkit for rendering. If you want a quick way to confirm this, make a new WOComponent. Open a browser to a webpage & view source. Copy the source to the clipboard. In WOBuilder, look at the source view. Select all & then paste. You should now have the source from the page you selected. Look at the preview & you'll see it renders exactly like Safari. In a real component any static elements would render correctly, but it sounds like what you want is a means to see a representation of the dynamic elements. Since there isn't any actual data from those elements, in preview it simply shows the element name. Since there isn't any data there, it has nothing to render with CSS.

In theory, out of the box elements could have dummy placeholders used for preview. But, since you can make your own elements, WOBuilder would have no way to know what placeholder data would be appropriate for those elements.

On Feb 4, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Andre wrote:


On 平成 18/02/04, at 8:52, Guido Neitzer wrote:

On 04.02.2006, at 8:17 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Is there any chance that Webobject Buider would use Webkit so we can have a "true" preview with all the CSS formating etc.?

I have never seen a WebObjects application more complex than a "Hello, WOrld", where this could display ANYTHING useful.
Well, just the ability to have some idea what the page would look like would be nice, after all there is a preview, and it shouldn't be too hard to accomplish I would think....

All my applications have lots of conditionals, switch components, database content, dynamic CSS creation or loading based on runtime information and so on.
Yes, I understand. I guess thats why they have 3 basic views, code, layout and preview.... I just wish preview actually previewed correctly.

It would be much more helpful, when WebObjects could produce valid xhtml instead of fiddling around with the new GUI tools (they are only good, because they show, that someone at Apple has some interest in WO).
Yes, I agree, this is something major, I don't like at all.

Since WO is "free" now I wish they could make the dev tools at least open sourced. There's a ton of stuff I would love to get down on if I could....


cug

--
PharmaLine, Essen, GERMANY
Software and Database Development



Andre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/nmeersschaert% 40mac.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to