Please, Slony... We're using it and you have to rebuild it replication
schema everytime you change your replicated schema, or else the
replication process will stop. This is one area where MySQL is way
adhead (replication is built-in and far easier to manage than Slony).
Postgresql has various clustering options: SLony, pgpool, etc. They
don't believe in a one size fits all solution.
-arturo
On May 3, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
From what I can see, it certainly has one advantage: clustering
support. Nice!
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/05/04, at 00:25, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
Yes, but I did ask about PostgreSQL! :) I know that almost
everything out there is better than MySQL. What I was asking for
was a comparison between PgSQL and FrontBase, to know if the
FrontBase advantages are good enough to make me thing about using
FrontBase instead of PgSQL.
The problem with that is I don't know anything about PgSQL. 6 years
ago when I was picking databases, it was kind of feeble, and not
supported very well on OSX.
Don't know where its at now.
I do know that FB works extremely well with WO, which is why I
posted that info here.
:-)
Pierce
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
