Prior to Apple making WO part of the toolset, I thought that it was
'advertise or die'. Now, that's not really the case. Why should
they advertise it? They don't really advertise any of the other
tools, right? (except for maybe Quicktime).
Anyway, look at it this way... the less developers that know about
WO, the more we have the space to ourselves, right? :)
Ken
On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 7, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Yep! But I was thinking about something more explicit, something
like "WO Rulez"!
Or "Where's WebObjects 6 ?" or "When EOF will be available for
Ruby ?" :-)
WebObjects.
Advertise it.
Motherfucker.
Then we sit in the front row at Steve's opening address.
:-)
--
Coming sometime... - an introduction to web applications using
WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/
practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%
40anderhome.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
