On 12.07.2006, at 2:20 Uhr, Chuck Hill wrote:
I am not surprised that the presentation is easier in WO, HTML is a rather simple, constrained UI. The difference in business logic between CoreData and WO/EOF is intriguing. What is in CoreData / lacking in WO that makes CoreData easier?
I don't know how they want to build an application that incorporates CoreData AND uses a Client-Server-Model AND compare the development speed with WebObjects. EOF and CoreData look similar but are designed for a very different target market.
And as long as SQLite is the only "database type" storage backend for CoreData, it's not really an option for applications where you also think of using WebObjects or an enterprise class database.
cug _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
