Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Owen,

Comments in-line below.

On Jul 13, 2006, at 10:11 PM, Owen McKerrow wrote:


Hi All,

We are setting up an application of ours on a clients server, they did some stress testing to see if they needed a bigger box and discovered something strange.
Their comments ....

The webobjects versions have been stress tested further, we are getting ok results but far worse then I was hoping. RIS Public faired worse the RIS with it starting to get error with only 5 simultaneous users making simple request 5 seconds apart (running with 2 instances each with - mx512M.


That is odd.  Are you dispatching requests concurrently?


No, getting them to retest with it on.


That should make a considerable difference, unless the app is doing a lot of EOF activity.


A major point of interest is that garbage collection does not appear to be
active for these instances.


Check for I/O and DB usage. How long does the average request take to process?


From the stats page :
Transactions 691 Active Session 0 Average transactions 5.031 Averegae idle 131.627


Five seconds on average is, IMHO, way too long.


Mine 2 :)

Either all of your actions are a little slow or some are very slow. Sight unseen, my money is on the latter. Usually this is the result of DB access,
either queries that are slow to evaluate due to missing indexes


DOH ! **Hits self in the head** Thats one thing I need to do when there DBA gets back from holidays :) We moved the DB from OpenBase to Oracle and we haven't been back an applied indexing yet : )


That would cause problems.  :-)


or lots of single row queries due to a lack of batch faulting and pre-fetching in the application.


I have fiddled with it today. At the beginning of the day it looked like (Note this a request for a page that loads a displaygroup to display every publication I have in the DB and the stats before are for the first time it is accessed for the app ) :

09:45:42,150 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:48 <init>) - Publication Constructor 09:45:43,188 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:149 updatePublicationListing) - Update Pubs 09:45:45,001 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:208 updatePublicationListing) - End Update Pubs.762 total Pubs 09:45:48,257 OFF [WorkerThread0] (Log.NSLogOut:1546 appendln) - Now asleep

After my tweaks ( the biggest time saver here was changing to use EOSharedEditingContext, as its a read only ap ) :

13:32:53,295 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:48 <init>) - Publication Constructor 13:32:54,174 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:143 updatePublicationListing) - Update Pubs for Faculty of Education 13:32:54,920 DEBUG [WorkerThread0] (PublicationsList:196 updatePublicationListing) - End Update Pubs.762 total Pubs 13:32:58,467 OFF [WorkerThread0] (Log.NSLogOut:1546 appendln) - Now asleep

So between the constructor ( line 1 ) and the time the Pubs have been loaded (line 3) went from 2.8 seconds to 1.6 ( and will hopefully get faster once I index **Hits self in the head again**) But the biggest time is between the end of the updatePublicationsList() and sleep(). I need to do some further testing to see if Im grabbing more objects from the DB ( as you said "lots of single row queries.") or its because of the actual page itself. The site has a quotation style engine in it which basically on the fly changes the way in which a publication is displayed. This is what suspect is chewing up time. The other reason I think this may be the case is the time between line 3 and line 4 doesn't change when I come back to the page i.e. the EO's should be in memory, but the time to "render" the page seems to be the same.


I think you have reached the correct conclusion there.


Are you a Project Wonder user?


Nope, always wonder, never plunged. It may be my pet project while Im at WWDC this year.


That sounds like another T-Shirt idea for Mike Schrag: Have you WONDERed? or Always WONDER!


How about,

WO Problems ? No WONDER : WONDER

cheers,
 - shaun
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to