That's for the myth of having a Java WO app generating the same
SQL as the tools (we had this on the WOLips list today).
FWIW, EM is now a part of the WO tool chain. I understood you to mean
that and that it didn´t generate the same code as a WO app. If you
didn't mean to say that, I'm sorry. But there is no "myth" involved
here, it´s simply that the tool creating the same SQL as the app
wasn't the case before Mike's work and it is possible now.
Anyway, EM is using exactly the same code that the WO app is using.
It may or may not be that your model creates a different output with
EM or EOM, but no one ever argued that - neither should anyone care.
EOMs SQL generation is extremely flaky so you may see all kinds of
strange flukes. Just go try to sync your model...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 31.07.2006 um 21:22 schrieb Guido Neitzer:
On 31.07.2006, at 21:14 Uhr, Anjo Krank wrote:
Holey baloney, some people really don't know when to stop...
Have you read the stuff? Have you read it? Really? I don't think
so. This is for a different case, a different model. A different
problem.
I think it's better not to read/answer any of your mails for while
to calm down a bit.
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
