The last Xcode release did not increment the WO numbers though there were some bug fixes. This may just be a remedial adjusting of the numbers.

On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:01 PM, Gavin Eadie wrote:

There have been version number changes in the WO frameworks from XCode 2.3 to XCode 2.4, as represented below (I have a little WO App which prettyprints info.plist info from any framework in the classpath). I've not seen any delta documents yet ... Gavin

XCode 2.3
Bundle Name             :           Short Version

"WebObjects Framework"  :           5.3.1
"JavaFoundation"        :           5.3.1
"WebObjects JavaXML"    :           5.3
"JavaWOExtensions"      :           5.3.1
"JavaEOAccess"          :           5.3.1
"JavaEOControl"         :           5.3.1

XCode 2.4
Bundle Name             :           Short Version

"WebObjects Framework"  :           5.3.2
"JavaFoundation"        :           5.3.2
"WebObjects JavaXML"    :           5.3
"JavaWOExtensions"      :           5.3.2
"JavaEOAccess"          :           5.3.2
"JavaEOControl"         :           5.3.2
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill% 40global-village.net

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Coming in 2006 - an introduction to web applications using WebObjects and Xcode http://www.global-village.net/wointro

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects




_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to