Sorry about replying to a couple of posts at once.
And on top of this, WOBuilder is pretty much a POS anyway, ... DID), I don't want to just remake WO Builder, because I fundamentally disagree with its workflow as a viable tool for component
I undertake some substantial human-facing projects and contrary to opinion here, I do find WO Builder to be a really fabulous, pragmatic tool despite its blemishes. I don't particularly need CSS integration in WO Builder despite using CSS heavily in the end result. I suppose many of us work in different ways and our apps are probably slightly differently architectured so these tools may have differing levels of applicability depending on the way we operate.
I have so say that I wish Apple would put back that QuickTime overview presentation that they used to have describing both WO
Yes I agree that the QT overview movie was *really* well done and I often pointed people at it to get an idea of what WebObjects was all about -- it saved a huge amount of time. It would be good if maintenance of this basic level of promotion for WO were possible.
So, if you really want to contribute - as opposed to just use or bitch about - the new Eclipse tool chain, you are..
Fair call; thanks *heaps* to the guys who have worked on this area to date and if moving to eclipse (wasn't at WWDC) becomes a necessity, I hope I can find some time to contribute in the future.
cheers. ___ Andrew Lindesay www.lindesay.co.nz _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
