On Aug 13, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
Hi, Pierce, et al,
I strongly prefer the simplicity built into the current named-WO-
tag reference to attributes in the .wod file. At times I would
prefer slightly more convenience at product creation time when I'm
hand editing the files, but that always weighs against the limited
amount of trouble that the current scheme can allow neophytes to
cause as I'm professionally called in to clean up their messes.
Point zero:
Any templating scheme can be in addition to the current scheme
and may be
more appropriate useful then the current schemes in additional
contexts like
XML and Javascript generation. It's mostly a matter of having a
different
template parser on the front end. Tweaking the templating scheme
might then make it easier to hook into an open-source WYSIWYG editor
like Nvu or whatever Eclipse has.
In regards to your point:
A tool that understands WO tags might make it _harder_ for a
neophyte to cause a mess.
Pierce
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
