You could always leave it in with a note that it is a case study for the inquisitive into the pros and cons of reengineering? Sort of a modern version of QED.

Paul

On 29 Jun 2007, at 19:07, Janine Sisk wrote:

On Jun 29, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:


Ah ha!  So it is a bug in the tutorial.  Oh Janine....  :-)

Congratulations, that's the first non-typo problem report. Well, actually it probably is a typo, but in a bad place. ;) I guess it's time to get a a new version released.

So my question is; is there a simple solution to this problem, and if
not, why bother with the MIME type field at all?

I don't think any solution is particularly simple. Anything that you do at this level is going to be hack. Janine and I have been discussing various ways of handling this nicely, but that is for a latter step in the turtorial. I guess we need to discuss the "not simple and too much work" case again.

Well, I could just drop the mime type field altogether; it's not actually used for anything right now as far as I recall. I left it in because I was hoping we'd come up with a way of detecting the mime type during the validation process, so I could give a better error message if the user tries to upload something that's not an image, and by the time we decided that was too much trouble it was also too much trouble to go through and take mime type out.

So it can go either way - I can remove the field, or we can figure out how to make proper use of it.

Yes!  Bravo Janine!

Thanks! Of course Chuck gets a big chunk of the credit too, he helped a lot with making sure I wasn't teaching anyone bad habits.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to