On 09/07/2007, at 1:55 AM, Ricardo Strausz wrote:
I think that, either you did not understand me or I did not make my
self clear (or both), so just to clarify ...
That's entirely possible ;-)
This makes a question go round in my mind:
was it an intelligent move, to move out WO from its X-centrism?
Yes. Xcode is not a Java-centric IDE. Java developers need a proper
Java IDE as WebObjects is not the only Java platform in town.
I meant, while from WO4 to WO5, WO changed from being done in
Objective-C, to be done in Java.
Yep I thought when you referred to 'X' you were referring to Xcode. I
wasn't in the WebObjects game for the Objective-C days but given the
breadth of libraries available for Java I'd say it was still a good
move (and I do prefer ObjC as a language in many ways).
all that effort could be putted in ... in something else, right?
By whom?
Do you know who maintain the project?
Yes, (though anyone can contribute)... but your question assumes that
Apple hadn't decided to deprecate the tools or give WO away for free.
I repeat, only 12% develop outside OSX --- why should we worry that
much about them ;^(
Because WebObjects deploys to any platform. WebObjects should
therefore be developed on any platform.
mmmhhh
with regards,
--
Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
