I had disabled them (see other thread asking if they were needed anymore). I figured that maybe this is what was causing my problem, so I re-enabled the .xcodeproj, but not the PB.project file.

Turns out Rapid Turnaround needs the PB.project file to be there.
So the official story here:

WO has this sort of crazy package called com.webobjects._ideservices. This is the code that implements support for your WO app talking with your IDE. The implementation that is built into WO <= 5.4 does something like:

1) talk to an xml rpc service running in the IDE to get a list of projects
2) ... if that succeeds it continues to use this service or
3) ... if that fails it tries to read out of PB.project files

WOLips has a really bad partial implementation of the webservice in #1 -- You can turn this on and off in WOLips Prefs=>PB Server Preferences. A major problem with this server is that it's SUPER chatty. You'll take a huge performance hit in development with this thing running. If you turn it off, but continue to generate PB.project files, then your success hinges on how well WOLips generates PB.proj's. Honestly I haven't seen in this code in so long that I just don't recall what its state is.

So there's actually a secret #0 in this list, which is that I have a new implementation of rapid turnaround that is designed for WOLips, but it's based on source that I can't release (if I decompiled ...... which i don't ...... it might be based on decompiled code). This has been submitted to Apple, but I'll let Pierre comment on if/when/ whether that will go into WO proper. I can possibly release this as a binary-only jar in the meantime that people can drop into their projects ...... That might work out.

ms


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to