Like Mike said, JBND is made so to be as data storage type
independent as possible, even though it's primary purpose always was
to bind WO and Swing. I will make sure that translations for WO
qualifiers are provided.
Talking about WO evolution, I already have a few places in my code
where it might be beneficial to have different behavior depending on
the WO version. Is there a simple and fail-proof way to check the
version of the libraries (in my case those would be client libraries)
during runtime? If not, I'd be happy to make a feature request, and
urge others to do the same.
My best,
Flor
On Feb 01, 2008, at 18:16, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
Why not use the WebObjects one? As least it would stay compatible
as we make it evolve for the next version…
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:54, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:
Lachlan, Mike,
Thanks for your replies.
On Feb 01, 2008, at 16:25, Mike Schrag wrote:
Entity Modeler has an EOQualifier format parser in it (that is
not currently the one being used), and Cayenne has its expression
parser. Both of these are open-source and could be easily
adapted. In Entity Modeler, look in
org.objectstyle.eomodeler.model.qualifiers.
Sounds great, didn't think of that...
Flor
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/pierre%
40apple.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
