Good point.
I think I'll speak for my manager and say the key is "Open Source".
And also, another key, at least for the part of interchangeability,
is POJO or container or something managed by configuration files like
Struts I guess. I dunno. I can't tell you exactly what the director
would say. But hey I introduced the use of FOP to transform objects
in XML format to PDFs! That idea worked for her.
Someone also mentioned about the term "Support". I am referring to
Apple's clear claim/distinction that WebObjects 5.3+ is NOT
"supported" on Windows. It would go a long way for Apple if they
just extended support to Windows, as bad as it sounds.
= Robert =
From: Robert Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:37:13 -0400
Am I missing something? How can anyone say that OpenLaszlo is any
less proprietary than WO. WO is a framework of some Java classes.
At my office we use ADF/BC an Oracle framework of some Java
classes. OpenLaszlo is a framework of, well I don't know what, but
it certainly isn't any less proprietary. Code written in OpenLaszlo
would still need to run with dependency on that framework correct?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
