How about let's not be drones and propagate FUD. A bit of research
and the truth can be known:
http://twitter.com/ev/statuses/801530348
From what I can tell the issue that caused this FUD in the first
place had nothing to do with the framework. They appear to have lost
a database server. So maybe it was poor planning, or possibly the
wrong architecture for the particular job. Now maybe RoR had
something to do with it, but none of use here are involved enough to
truly know.
All that being say I still say, "Go WebObjects." But, just because we
have something great doesn't give us the right to bash others and
spread FUD.
On May 3, 2008, at 10:37 AM, David LeBer wrote:
On 3-May-08, at 8:40 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/01/twitter-said-to-be-abandoning-
ruby-on-rails/
Maybe we should start write-in campaigns. Go WebObjects GoOooooo.
Or maybe not (considering the source):
<http://ismikearringtonadick.com/>
;david
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/robert.walker%
40bennettig.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Walker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
