if yours work, don't mess with them ... many of mine still use javac
because they work, i hate build systems, and the thought of messing
with them makes me grumpy.
On Aug 6, 2008, at 10:27 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Aug 6, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
This is the line 229: <javac srcdir = "src" destdir = "bin">
You want wocompile rather than javac ... I don't know if this is an
ant bug or just some way that our build files abuse something, but
ant has this asinine behavior where it tries to traverse the entire
directory structure to find files that match the given patternsets,
only you don't have read access for some of those files, which
causes it to explode. wocompile does not have this problem. I
believe a modern build.xml does not use javac, so you can create a
new project to get a template to work from.
Mike,
Is there a difference in the resulting build between javac and
wocompile if the build is executing successfully?
My heavily modified (for Java Client) build.xml file still uses
javac as well and if I don't _need_ to mess with it, I don't want to.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
