Yep, that's what I did, as well as removing the offending "inverse" relationships. I changed to the ERXEC.newEditingContext originally to get rid of the "you don't have a delegate" error. What I didn't try was adding the "inverse" relationships back in while using ERXEC to create the new editing context, since for now I don't use the inverse links anyway. I may need them in the future though so might be interesting to add them back and see what happens. I'll let you know.
Jeff On Wednesday, August 06, 2008, at 01:02PM, "Mike Schrag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Actually, I was using: >> >>>>>>> EOObjectStoreCoordinator parentObjectStore = new >>>>>>> EOObjectStoreCoordinator(); >>>>>>> EOEditingContext threadEditingContext = new >>>>>>> EOEditingContext(parentObjectStore); >You're using Wonder, right? I just setup a test case of this and it >worked fine, except that you should be using ERXEC to get your editing >context: > > EOObjectStoreCoordinator coord = new EOObjectStoreCoordinator(); > EOEditingContext ec = ERXEC.newEditingContext(coord); > >Try that and see if it makes a difference. > >ms > > _______________________________________________ >Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jeffandmonica%40mac.com > >This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
