That's an approach I thought about, and am considering.
Do you have any concerns about read/write to the db being
overwhelming? (We're using the status as a percentage of process
completion.)
On Sep 4, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
What I normally do in these cases is store the status information in
a table
in the database - as I really don't want to touch my session from a
DA that
is called from a thread parallel to the RR loop.
I only have to make sure to always get fresh information from the
DB, that's
about it.
cug
On 04.09.08 21:17, "Josh Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not storing the id in cookies, as this will ultimately wind up as
a web service.
I have moved the thread, which seems to have helped (as there's no
new
session being created). Now I just need to figure out why the
'status'
isn't being set (or read) correctly.
On Sep 4, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 5:43 PM, Josh Paul wrote:
I'm not swallowing exceptions anywhere, and if I am they're
printing to stdout.
I do think the session is locked or not checked in. I need to
investigate further.
That would give you deadlock or unlocked access, not create a new
session.
Are you storing the session ID in cookies too?
Chuck
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:41 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Only thought I have is that it might not be a good idea to fire
that DA from
a spawned thread from the RR loop. You might end up trying to
check out a
session from the session store that is already checked out.
Not sure what would cause the creation of a new session though ...
maybe
that it is throwing an exception while trying to access the old
(but locked)
session and this could create a new session.
Are you swallowing exceptions somewhere?
cug
On 04.09.08 16:33, "Josh Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
100%.
I left out the fact that this is related to a Thread, as that's
where
the status is being created. So, I have a DA that fires the
process
and another DA that checks in on it. The issue is that when
checking,
a new Session keeps getting created.
Thoughts?
On Sep 4, 2008, at 3:26 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
And you are sure, your session is not terminated somewhere else?
cug
On 04.09.08 15:59, "Josh Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using WO 5.3 with a version of Wonder about 1 week old...
On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 04.09.08 15:42, "Chuck Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
That sort of thing should work. Which version of WO? There
may
have
been some related bugs in earlier versions of 5.4
As far as I know, that should work. But I always call
"existingSession()"
before I do anything else in a DA call.
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village
.net
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
