Why not plop a WO wrapper around something like Apache Agila or some
other standards-based framework?

Just thinking out loud - no idea how hard this would be....

geoff

2008/11/23 Mark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'll have to look in my archived stuff, I don't have it on my laptop
> anymore.
>
> It was done in WO 4.5 (Java), so it will definitely need some updating.
>
> The general approach is you define a workflow as queues and actions, and for
> each valid combination of queue and action while in that queue, a
> destination queue.  (Stored in the db, of course.)
>
> Any object you wanted to participate in the workflow had to implement a
> simple protocol.  The framework provides your app a list of objects in any
> given queue and a list of valid actions for a queue.  It implements the
> actions, and keeps a log of where an object as been.  You could register for
> notifications of objects entering or leaving queues, to perform other tasks.
>  You could register delegates to run a method to determine if an action was
> allowed on a given object, for finer control.  There was a concept of
> locking objects, used to let other users know someone was processing an
> object, and objects could automatically or manually be unlocked.
>
> It didn't provide any UI as I recall, but gave your app the information and
> methods it needed.
>
> The project this was used on had 14 total queues.  Once it was implemented,
> approvals that had been taking a week or more averaged about a day.
>
> Now to find the hard drive and/or DVDs it's stored on....  ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> On Nov 23, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/2008, at 4:27 AM, Mark Morris wrote:
>>
>>> I wrote one a few years ago.  From time to time I've thought about
>>> updating it as well as another framework and contributing them, if people
>>> might find them useful.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> There are a few ways to approach workflow.  Email me and we can see if
>>> what I have might be a good fit for your project.  I put a lot of time and
>>> thought into it.  It is generic, and it was used very successfully in a
>>> project a while back.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote:
>>>
>>>>        I can't seem to locate a framework for handling workflow.  Does
>>>> one exist?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/markm%40onpointsoftware.com
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lachlan.deck%40gmail.com
>>>
>>> This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> with regards,
>> --
>>
>> Lachlan Deck
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/geoff.hopson%40gmail.com
>
> This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright
until you hear them speak………
Mario Kart Wii: 2320 6406 5974
LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/geoffhopson
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to