Hi!And because of the Objective-C heritage, where (thank god) no one uses the get on getters.
Yours Miguel Arroz On 2009/03/31, at 19:01, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Dan Grec wrote:On 31-Mar-09, at 9:49 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Simon McLean wrote:Crikey. For a while I've been tempted to suggest that we move the whole of Wonder to use the "get" prefixGrrrrrrCan I ask why WO as a whole doesn't use the 'get' prefix?It is a silly Java hack for JavaBeans. It adds no value to the method name, just makes it longer. It makes it harder to parse a list of methods as so many are named get...To start with. -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP DevelopmentPractical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/arroz%40guiamac.com This email sent to ar...@guiamac.com
........................... http://www.survs.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
