No, I thought it wasn't really clear either - I thought it was local storage at first too, but it's not - It's a Javascript CoreData implementation accessing an ERXRest backend on the server. If I'm wrong someone please correct me.
John On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, David Avendasora <[email protected] > wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2009, at 12:18 PM, John Huss wrote: > > >> Also, you would have to rewrite EOEditingContext and related classes in >>> Javascript, which is a fairly large task. >>> >> >> But I thought that was part of what Gianduia did and what made it so much >> cooler than last years rich-client-of-the-moment Sprout Core. >> >> Yes, but CoreData != EOF. They are similar, but not the same. I'm not >> sure why they chose CoreData instead of EOF; maybe since CoreData was newly >> designed it is actually better than EOF; I don't know, I haven't used it. >> > > Okay. I must have misunderstood that part of the presentation. I thought > that CoreData was there just for local persistence of things and that it > _also_ had EOF-like ECs also. > > Too much WOWODC content, too too few notes! > > Dave >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
