On 08/07/2009, at 10:03 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
I did not comment on AppleInsider (and I'm not jlm808 :) ) but what
gets my pissed off about journalists (these, and others) is the fact
that they grab a few facts, and take stupid conclusions out of them.
While it annoys me too, I would rather spend my energy hacking on code
than wasting my breath (keystrokes?) educating people who don't really
matter. They aren't a part of the WO community so I don't care.
Yes, eventually, Snow Leopard won't include WO (these things were
supposed to be under NDA, but.... yeah) which, as you said, and me,
and many other people, is a good thing. But picking that up and
writing that "the company will drop deployment support for its
WebObjects web application server in Mac OS X Snow Leopard Server"
is plain stupidity. There's a huge diference between "not supported"
and "not included on the default installation". It's the same as
saying FreeBSD doesn't support Apache server because it doesn't come
installed on the base installation. It's ridiculous.
The fact that it took apple this long to unshackle webobjects from
OSX / XCode is ridiculous.
Anyway, moving on...
And hanging out for the next episode. I love watching this show, the
suspense, the drama. :)
--
Seeya...Q
Quinton Dolan - [email protected]
Gold Coast, QLD, Australia (GMT+10)
Ph: +61 419 729 806
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
