On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Klaus Berkling wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Klaus Berkling wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Mike Nowak wrote:
Right because then my boss sees the article and says oh no,
should we stop using WebObjects?
No, you should NOT stop using WebObjects. Remember Radar
O'Reilly on M*A*S*H? "Wait for it...."
Yup, already prepared my boss for this.... preemptively.
Waiting patiently - mainly to see if I want/need to write any
deployment tools.
Versions of wotaskd and JavaMonitor (based on source released by
Apple) are in Wonder. I use them (though not yet in a heavy
production environment). Adding an installer would be useful.
Yes, and not that hard to do. Maybe it would be possible to
redistribute WebObjects as well when the waiting is done (well,
probably not).
I already deploy my woapps as packages (via ARD).
The current license allows you to redistribute WebObjects as part of
an application, but ONLY for the purposes of running that application
(i.e. you can't extract it and use it to develop a new WO app).
I have no idea what changes may appear in future licensing. I very
much doubt that Apple will make them more restrictive.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
