On 2009-09-09, at 7:33 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
From a security standpoint, I'd say Wonder gets it right. I'd
rather have to turn things on, rather than forget/be unaware of
something and be left exposed by the defaults.
Just my 2 cents though...
There are plenty of legacy apps that depend on the current defaults
from Wonder.
Changing to a less conservative default would certainly be a rude
awakening for some.
Ramsey
On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Greg Brown wrote:
Should the default rules that ship with the Wonder D2W frameworks
have the rules to allow editing, right out of the box, so to speak?
I would say yes, one should be able to edit the DB. What do others
think?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/dleber_wodev%40codeferous.com
This email sent to [email protected]
;david
--
David LeBer
Codeferous Software
'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing'
site: http://codeferous.com
blog: http://davidleber.net
profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber
twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld
--
Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group:
http://tacow.org
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
