i'd be very interested to see the diffs ... how clean is the port? did
you keep the bindings intact? that was one of the big issues when i
first looked at this (actually for jquery) -- maintaing full api
compatibility was actually kind of tricky, but there are impedance
mismatches between the various libraries, and Ajax.framework's
bindings are very prototype/scriptaculous-specific.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to use Wonder's Ajax Framework with the MooTools JavaScript
framework. So I look at the components I needed (ASB, AUC, AUL
etc...) and ported them over to use MooTools on the front end. I
created some of my own components as well and I had them extend
either AjaxComponent or AjaxDynamicElement.
So far everything seems to be working well - does anyone think there
any pitfalls with this strategy?
Thanks in advance,
Johnny
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com
This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
