All in a single jar? really? I definitely believe having multiple jars works fine, because they're still bundles, but having a single jar seems like it might break. Wouldn't the EOF plugins explode because you could only have one Info.plist in the jar and you couldn't define the plugin's principal class? Put me down as "skeptical," but it's certainly possible it might work.
On Nov 24, 2009, at 10:45 PM, John Huss wrote: > Yeah, you don't need a bundle. You just have to load the model yourself with > a path or url. > > John > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello; > > If I build a little stand-alone application in a jar file and want to use EOF > away from WebObjects, is the concept of a "bundle" relevant? In other words, > can I avoid the concept of a bundle? I ask because the build system would > involve combining the majority of the "jars" into one build product. > > cheers. > > ___ > Andrew Lindesay > www.lindesay.co.nz > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com > > This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
