basically anything that touches the eodb/eodbc ... this one goes into the "hard to change without source" bucket. you'd have to basically rewrite all of eodb/eodbc to allow concurrent access, which would probably mean an mvcc implementation of eodb. as a curiously out-of-the-blue aside, i hope we eventually get 5.6.
ms On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote: > Some food for thought there... i.e., what parts actually require single > threading... how hard would that be to change... > > On 02/12/2009, at 8:38 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > >> EOEditingContext.objectsWithFetchSpecification calls lockObjectStore, which >> locks the EODatabaseContext >> >> ms >> >> On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote: >> >>> Where does EOF do it's locking to prevent two queries from executing at the >>> same time. I have source, I'm just struggling to find it. >>> >>> -Lon >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension.com >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lachlan.deck%40gmail.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] > > with regards, > -- > > Lachlan Deck > > > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
