It's not about load balancing for me, it's about resiliency.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:09 PM, "Miguel Arroz"<ar...@guiamac.com> wrote:
Hey!
On 2009/12/05, at 01:46, Mike Schrag wrote:
And I'm not talking about asynchronous replication, I'm talking
about real multi-master cluster with guaranteed integrity.
That's what I'm referring ... I have not used it, only read about
it enough to be intrigued by it. It requires your entire database
to be loaded into memory, but memory is pretty damn cheap. If you
have a truly HUGE database, this is not an option, but most of ours
are not larger than the reasonable max amount of memory.
Err... unless you have a monster machine with hundreds of GBs, why
would you want to cluster a small DB? I don't see any scenario where
I need to load balance a DB with half a dozen of GBs.
If that's the MySQL way, I would say the PgSQL is probably best! ;)
Yours
Miguel Arroz
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
