On 2010-06-14, at 4:28 PM, David LeBer wrote: > > On 2010-06-14, at 4:11 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote: > >> That's what I thought. I tried a full page reload to force the update, and >> the page comes back as it was, with the performance details. >> >> <Screen shot 2010-06-14 at 4.06.40 PM.png> > > How is that to-one modelled? i.e: This 'should' work fine, let me double > check but I think what you are seeing is atypical.
Yeah, I just tested with an optional to-one in a current project and it worked fine. So I'm not sure what you are seeing here. > >> >> If I then save I get this: >> >> <Screen shot 2010-06-14 at 4.04.11 PM.png> > > I keep meaning to make the validation markers work better with more complex > property level components... > >> I noticed that if the window is narrower, the new and search buttons in the >> Performance div are hidden under the contents of the div. Of course that >> doesn't explain why those contents are there anyway, as the relationship >> should have been removed. Part of this looks like a CSS bug. Though Ajax >> might not be clearing out the old values, even if they'd been removed from >> the relationship in the ec. I am not much of a javascript guy (I rely on >> Wonder, etc. to do that stuff for me whenever possible) I'll look at it to >> the best of my abilities though. > > Width, yeah. I didn't want to specify a fixed width for anything as that > would really depend on your usage, but that means there is no 'minimum' and > things have a tendency to act weird when you reduce the window below the size > of your content. > > YMMV, leave that as an exercise for the reader, etc. > >> >> Andrew >> >> On Jun 14, 2010, at 3:48 PM, David LeBer wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2010-06-14, at 3:40 PM, Andrew R. Kinnie wrote: >>> >>>> I used that rule, and unchecked my old rule. It worked! Thanks. >>>> However, now I am having issues if I want to delete the related >>>> performance (more precisely, remove that performance). I click remove, >>>> and the page does not refresh and continues to show the old related >>>> performance (though apparently the relationship has been removed, because >>>> saving causes an error . . . missing the required relationship). >>> >>> The ERMActionButtons (inspect, remove, delete, etc) perform ajax updates. >>> >>> You might want to try and debug that in FireFox/FireBug to see if there is >>> something breaking. >> > > ;david > > -- > David LeBer > Codeferous Software > 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' > site: http://codeferous.com > blog: http://davidleber.net > profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber > twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld > -- > Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: > http://tacow.org > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/dleber_wodev%40codeferous.com > > This email sent to dleber_wo...@codeferous.com ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
