Ah, that makes a little more sense. We're using WO 5.4.3.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Mark Ritchie wrote: > > > On 8/Jul/2010, at 10:58 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: > >> Is the database content (not the schema) the same for both deployments? > Could one have a very large number of back-pointing relationships that the > other does not have? If so, I will suggest that you have a modelling issue. > If not... puzzling. > > > > If this were the case, then there should be a select in the SQL log with > a large number of records? > > Or perhaps many selects due to faulting or some such... > > Greg, what's the SQL log look like? > > I think that without Anjo's change, even if the objects are already in > memory it can be slow even for a few 10 of Ks of EOs. If they have to be > fetched, it gets even worse. > > Chuck > > > -- > Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development > > Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall > knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. > http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
