Hm. Then again, IIRC we use strings for paths... so you probably *could* give these methods a "jar:xxx" string and handle that in the method. Not the cleanest way, but what the heck.
I'm not sure if not using the default props is that good a thing. Sometimes these change or get added to and you would want to get the additions. Cheers, Anjo Am 23.07.2010 um 14:56 schrieb [email protected]: > >> The reason we don't do it ourself is that a lot of that stuff calls into >> erxfileutils and that uses path names. Fixing it would be a lot of work and >> make code more complicated without a lot of real gain (at least from when I >> last looked at it). >> >> So unless any of the committers actually need to use this themselves, I >> wouldn't hold my breath waiting for it. >> >> Cheers, Anjo > > WARN er.extensions.foundation.ERXFileUtilities - Can't get path when run as > jar: ERNeutralLook - Properties > > Actually, having only Properties come from and set by my program--is a > feature--not a bug! This "feature" has not caused me any pain--yet. > > I generally would look at the properties included in the framework, but would > set the ones I want in my program's properties file. I am not sure what all I > am missing by having to work this way. > > NSBundle jars have additional features that regular frameworks do not! > (Sometimes.) > -- > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
