I am using an existing model framework to drive a new ERModernD2W interface. So, as an example, let's say I have a relationship defined like
foo <-->> bar foo.bar() returns all related records. But my frameworks have custom accessors that may return a more qualified set of data that users of my apps would be expecting. So I have methods like: foo.getBarForFoo() which filters certain un-needed results out. Most of my app would use the latter but sometimes I'd still want to use the former. But if I use "getBarForFoo()" in a D2W rule the relationship results just look like EOGenericRecord strings. So maybe D2W doesn't know what entity is being returned? Since not all my apps are D2W I don't want to change the signatures of these methods just to satisfy the places where D2W is used. I do want the restricted results. Does the rule system have a way of handling this? Tim Worman UCLA GSE&IS _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
