Technically you can put tomcat/glassfish behind Apache with mod_proxy_balancer if you wanted. Personally I'd do tomcat or jetty over glassfish. Go grab glassfish and enjoy mud wrestling with xml files. Tomcat and jetty just run out of the box with basically no work. You will most likely have to run multiple instances of whatever container you choose on different ports if you want to have more than one instance of your app running. If I had to run on windows, I would definitely go the tomcat/jetty/whatever route rather than trying to get the IIS adaptor going, but that's just me.
ms On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > What are the different advantages/disadvantages for the differing deployment > options. I'm assuming the main one is that without apache and the adaptor > you lose the load balancing and monitoring capabilities. Is this accurate? > What is the most common method? My main concerns are scalability and ability > to run on windows. (I just made myself sad.) > > Thanks. > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
