On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:09 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:

> okay, let me tell you what I want to accomplish.
> 
> I have a table of 100 rows. I want the user to select an arbitrary group of 
> rows and change the background color.
> 
> So I thought I would add a boolean setter and getter to the entity:

The entity?  This is a UI function, this belongs in the UI code.


> public void setIsSelectedForEdit(boolean _isSelectedForEdit) {
>       NSLog.out.appendln("setIsSelectedForEdit in the object = " + 
> _isSelectedForEdit);
>       this._isSelectedForEdit = _isSelectedForEdit;
> }
> 
> public boolean isSelectedForEdit() {
>       return _isSelectedForEdit;
> }
> 
> then if the users checks the checkbox in an arbitrary group I could know 
> which are selected and update the CSS. (I also have an AjaxObserveField 
> watching the checkBox and the whole thing is wrapped in an updateContainer)
> 
> it works, sort of. the attribute _isSelectedForEdit is getting set but the 
> Entity doesn't know it was changed. I don't care about saving this boolean 
> value, I just need to know which rows to color (I will save THIS value).

What is the difference?


> That's when I decided to try a 'Real' attribute. 
> 
> <td>
> <wo:WOCheckBox checked = "$theGridItem.globalUpdate" id = 
> "$session.rowID"/><webobject name = "SelectedForEditObserveField"/>
> </td>
> 
> globalUpdate is a real boolean attribute of my Grid object.

On the Grid?  Why?  This is to select rows, it should be on a row not the whole 
grid.


> if I bind this attribute to the checkBox, all the objects are marked as 
> updated.
> 
> so on a lark (or maybe it was a bluejay) I switched back to my original 
> setter with a nod to the real attribute:
> 
> public void setIsSelectedForEdit(boolean _isSelectedForEdit) {
>       NSLog.out.appendln("setIsSelectedForEdit in the object = " + 
> _isSelectedForEdit);
>       this._isSelectedForEdit = _isSelectedForEdit;
> 
>       /* let the value be false
>       * as I don't really care about this value
>       */
> 
>       this.takeValueForKey(false, _Grid.GLOBAL_UPDATE);
> }
> 
> This works as I want. the row get marked to update, the real value never 
> changes (I can throw it away) and 
> 
> NSLog.out.appendln("checkAlteredAction ==   " + theEC.updatedObjects()); 
> 
> only lists the rows that are selected (checked) as altered.
> 
> I don't want to say that there must be a better way. But if it works and 
> doesn't blow up then it is good, right?

Well, it is better than not working at all I suppose.  :-)


Chuck


> 
> There is just too much to learn for one lifetime.
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Tue, 3/29/11, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: Chuck Hill <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: changed objects
>> To: "Theodore Petrosky" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "David Avendasora" <[email protected]>, 
>> [email protected]
>> Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 11:23 AM
>> 
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 5:49 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
>> 
>>> I find that i have a boolean that is bound to the
>> 'checked' of my WOCheckBox:
>>> 
>>> wo:WOCheckBox checked = "$theGridItem.globalUpdate" /
>>> 
>>> Originally I thought it was because I had an
>> AjaxObserveField to watch the checkbox, so I deleted it. No
>> Joy. so as long as the WOCheckBox is there, I have this
>> issue. theEC.updatedObjects() believes that all the entities
>> have been updated.
>>> 
>>> The globalUpdate attribute is a boolean (intBoolean)
>> in my postgresql backend.
>>> 
>>> Am I screwing this up?
>> 
>> Probably.  :-)  You could override the setter and
>> log out the original and new value and see if that shows
>> anything.  An object being in the updated list just
>> indicates that it _may_ have changed. So either the value is
>> getting changed, or WOCheckBox is needlessly setting the
>> Boolean to the exact same value.
>> 
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>>> --- On Mon, 3/28/11, David Avendasora <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From: David Avendasora <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: changed objects
>>>> To: "Chuck Hill" <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: "Theodore Petrosky" <[email protected]>,
>> [email protected]
>>>> Date: Monday, March 28, 2011, 4:31 PM
>>>> Or, I believe, an MS SQL Server DB
>>>> with Date columns as locking attributes...
>>>> 
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> If all the objects are in that list, then all
>> have
>>>> been changed.  You might have a floating
>> point value
>>>> that is getting altered due to a formatter (e.g.
>> the scale
>>>> is different).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Theodore
>> Petrosky
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> OK I thought I did this before but I can
>> not think
>>>> of how I did it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have an EC made with:  theEC =
>>>> ERXEC.newEditingContext();
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I then get a list and use a displayGroup
>> to
>>>> display it in a table. I want to make a few edits,
>> then ask
>>>> the EC for the changed objects.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> NSLog.out.appendln("checkAltered
>>>> ==   " + theEC.updatedObjects());
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> updatedOjbects returns all the objects in
>> the
>>>> array. I just want the ones that were altered. Is
>> there a
>>>> way?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ted
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Chuck Hill     
>>    
>>>>     Senior Consultant / VP Development
>>>>> 
>>>>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want
>> to
>>>> increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or
>> who are
>>>> trying to solve specific problems.    
>>>>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They
>> will be
>>>> ignored.
>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list   
>>   ([email protected])
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects%40avendasora.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> This email sent to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Chuck Hill         
>>    Senior Consultant / VP Development
>> 
>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase
>> their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to
>> solve specific problems.    
>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 

-- 
Chuck Hill             Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall 
knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.    
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to