See below,

Le 12 mai 2011 à 19:33, Fred Wells a écrit :

> Almost but the SQL that get generated isn't right, any one know a way around 
> this error?
> 
> EvaluateExpression failed: 
> <com.webobjects.jdbcadaptor.MicrosoftPlugIn$MicrosoftExpression: "SELECT 
> DISTINCT t0.actualEndDate, t0.actualStartDate, t0.approvalOutput, 
> t0.childNbr, t0.description, t0.duration, t0.duration_days, 
> t0.duration_hours, t0.endDate, t0.fkParentTaskId, t0.fk_approval_user_id, 
> t0.fk_jobTemplate_id, t0.fk_job_id, t0.fk_phase_id, t0.fk_status_id, 
> t0.fk_taskType_id, t0.fk_workgroup_id, t0.idForTemplate, t0.isActive, 
> t0.name, t0.overdueNotified, t0.pkid, t0.startDate, t0.threshold, 
> t0.thresholdNotified, t0.threshold_days, t0.threshold_hours, t0.xCoordinate, 
> t0.yCoordinate FROM Task t0 WHERE (not ( EXISTS ( SELECT t1.pkid FROM Task 
> t1, UserTask T1 WHERE T1.taskPkid is not NULL AND t1.pkid = T1.taskPkid AND 
> t1.pkid = t0.pkid ) ) AND t0.fk_jobTemplate_id is NULL AND t0.isActive = ? 
> AND t0.fk_workgroup_id = ? AND (t0.fk_status_id = ? OR t0.fk_status_id = ? OR 
> t0.fk_status_id = ?))" withBindings: 1:"Y"(isActive), 2:4(fk_workgroup_id), 
> 3:4(fk_status_id), 4:5(fk_status_id), 5:2(fk_status_id)>: Next exception:SQL 
> State:S1000 -- error code: 1011 -- msg: The correlation name 'T1' is 
> specified multiple times in a FROM clause
> 
> 
> Here's my list of qualifiers:
> 
> EOQualifier qA = 
> ERXQ.or(ERXQ.equals("status",Status.startedStatus(editingContext())),ERXQ.equals("status",Status.lateStatus(editingContext())),ERXQ.equals("status",Status.thresholdStatus(editingContext())));
> EOQualifier qB = ERXQ.equals("workgroup", user.workgroup());
> EOQualifier qC = ERXQ.equals("isActive", strY);
> EOQualifier qD = ERXQ.isNull("jobTemplate");
> 
> EOQualifier qE = ERXQ.not(new 
> ERXExistsQualifier(ERXQ.isNotNull("userTasks.taskPkid"), "pkid"));

Hmm I guess you have Task ->> UserTask ... try something like that instead :

EOQualifier qE = new ERXExistsQualifier(ERXQ.isNotNull(UserTask.ID_KEY), 
"userTasks");

This qualifier should fetch all Tasks having some userTasks...the first 
argument in ERXExistsQualifier should be optional in this case, but it doesn't 
allow a null qualifier... 
You should test this first, then try it with your rather big qualifier. This 
single qualifier in a fspec "should" generate this SQL :
SELECT ... FROM TASK t0 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT t1.ID FROM USER_TASK t1 WHERE 
t1.ID is not NULL AND t1.ID_TASK = t0.ID)

However, I've done a quick test and it generates wrong SQL, something like :
SELECT ... FROM TASK t0 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT t1.ID FROM USER_TASK t1 WHERE 
t1.ID is not NULL AND t1.ID = t0.ID)

So, either i'm doing it wrong or there's a small bug in this qualifier 
(generates primary key column instead of foreign key), i've corrected it in my 
workspace.
 
But i'm curious to hear from the others, is there someone else using this 
qualifier successfully  ?

Hope it helps,

Alex



>                 
>                 EOQualifier qual8 = ERXQ.and(qA,qB,qC,qD,qE);
>                 
> 
> 
> From:        Alexis Tual <[email protected]>
> To:        John Huss <[email protected]>
> Cc:        Fred Wells <[email protected]>, 
> [email protected]
> Date:        05/11/2011 05:22 PM
> Subject:        Re: qualifier to check for empty toMany
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> John is right, if you have A ->> B, this should work :
> 
> EOQualifier qual = new ERXExistsQualifier( ERXQ.isNotNull(B.A_FK_KEY) , 
> A.TO_BS_KEY);
> ERXFetchSpecification<A> spec = new ERXFetchSpecification<A>(A.ENTITY_NAME, 
> qual, null);
> 
> (not tested though)
> 
> hope it helps
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 12 mai 2011 à 00:00, John Huss a écrit :
> 
> I think you can do this with ERXExistsQualifier and a Not qualifier.
> 
> John
> 
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Fred Wells <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hey all,
> Maybe I missed something but is there a way to construct a qualifier that 
> check that a toMany relationship is empty? Simply putting in "toMany =%@, new 
> NSArray(new Object[] {NSKeyValueCoding.NullValue}doesn't do it because it 
> tries to check across the join table which results in no objects being found.
> 
> -fw
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/alexis.tual%40gmail.com
> 
> This email sent to [email protected]
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Disclaimer 
> The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and 
> confidential information that is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you 
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
> copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information 
> is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or vendors, any information 
> contained in this e-mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and 
> conditions in any governing contract. If you have received this e-mail in 
> error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e-mail.

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to