Le 2011-05-20 à 00:07, Michael DeMan a écrit : > Hi John, > > Thanks for the follow up. > > The bottom line is that for the current contract that I am on, WO is plagued > in two (of the same old) areas: > > 1) Lack of developers. As we all know, its a pretty tiny marketplace. The > people generally are top notch, but nonetheless for a large company they need > from a risk management perspective to know that they can find people, whether > current employees or run over a bus, find more interesting things to do in > life - or whatever. > > 2) Lack of client side stuff.
I would like to know more about that lack. By "lack of client side stuff", you mean clients that are autogenerated from the server-side stuff? > I personally have steered clear of JavaScript since when Netscape first > prefixed the name 'java' onto their client-side browser scripting > technologies. Nonetheless, for large companies and for internal-only back > office operations, it is nice to be able to deliver quasi-native-desktop > application working environments to folks within the browser with minimal > risk to core functionality. It seems that GWT is relatively mature now and > is possibly a solution for the work scenario I am in. > > I will also follow up with you off-list within the couple of days. Again, > thank you for the follow up. > > - mike > > On May 19, 2011, at 8:24 PM, John Huss wrote: > >> I don't think it's actively maintained. I started a project called WOGWT >> (also on google code); it's out of date, but newer than this one. >> >> It really depends on what you need because you can communicate with a WO >> server in many possible ways: >> 1) JSON/XML via direct actions >> 2) JSON/XML via REST >> 3) JSON/XML via component actions >> 4) RPC via direct actions >> 5) RequestFactory somehow >> >> For JSON or XML you don't really need anything specific to GWT on the >> server. >> For RPC, WOGWT has a request handler you could use. >> RequestFactory is the newest RPC method in GWT and could be very useful, but >> I haven't heard of anyone integrating it with WO yet. >> >> What are you looking to do? >> >> John >> >> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Michael DeMan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Does anybody know status on the WOGST adaptor (is it reliable/well >> designed?) - or is there another standard technique to use to be able to >> utilize GWT on the client side with WebObjects on the back end? >> >> http://sites.google.com/site/wogwtadapter/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Mike DeMan >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/johnthuss%40gmail.com >> >> This email sent to [email protected] >> > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca > > This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
