That would be ironic to have an ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship modeled in EntityModeler though :)
Alex Le 5 août 2011 à 17:53, Ricardo J. Parada a écrit : > Yes, you're right. :-) > > I found ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship in your presentation but nowhere you > said it was part of entity modeler. > > :-) > > > > On Aug 5, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: > >> Ricardo, >> >> No, you were dreaming. :-) >> >> Regards, Kieran. >> (Sent from my iPhone) >> >> >> On Aug 4, 2011, at 5:35 PM, "Ricardo J. Parada" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I thought there was something about this in one of the sessions in this >>> WOWODC 2011 but I can't recall. Something about selecting >>> ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship in the entity modeler but I don't see it. >>> >>> Is there such as thing in entity modeler? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ricardo >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, I haven't even looked yet -- so excuse if I'm off base -- >>>> >>>> But shouldn't this be a part of the eo-templates? >>>> >>>> Just about every model has this potential problem, so is there a reason we >>>> can't check off a box in the modeler to suggest this is a unmodeled >>>> to-many or something and generate the methods? >>>> >>>> Not that making the method is hard or anything, more that it seems like a >>>> solid standard practice that should be elevated in visibility? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's easy, ….. >>>>> >>>>> (1) Copy and paste the example from that >>>>> er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship class javadoc into BBEdit >>>>> >>>>> (2) Do some find/replace editing >>>>> >>>>> (3) Paste the result into your entity class that needs to have the >>>>> "unmodeled" toMany relationship. >>>>> >>>>> (4) Delete the model toMany relationship in the relationships pane in the >>>>> EOModel. >>>>> >>>>> Test, and you are done. >>>>> >>>>> I have thought about having some user-info entry in the model entity that >>>>> could be used to auto generate this boiler-plate code in the eogen >>>>> superclass, but it just has not been a priority for me. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Kieran >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On a related note, with regards tens of millions on one side of a >>>>>>> to-many …. that will kill your performance on saving a change to that >>>>>>> relationship unless you make the relationship a one-sided relationship. >>>>>>> @see er.extensions.eof.ERXUnmodeledToManyRelationship<S, D> for one >>>>>>> solution to that situation. I recommend using an "unmodeled" toMany for >>>>>>> any relationship where the toMany can be in the thousands. YMMV. >>>>>> >>>>>> this is of interest to me -- >>>>>> >>>>>> any docs or just code to read on this subject? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rparada%40mac.com >>>> >>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/alexis.tual%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
