Hi Ramsey,

On 05/10/2011, at 12:58 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:

> On Oct 4, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> 
>> We have a framework that handles, among other things, authentication of 
>> users for applications.  It has an entity called Person which is generally 
>> subclassed by applications to add attributes/relationships relevant to the 
>> app.  For example, FooApp might have an entity FooPerson which inherits from 
>> Person, and adds the FooPerson.foos relationship to some Foo entity.  It 
>> works quite well.
> 
> Out of curiosity, what kind of inheritance?  Single table, horizontal, or 
> vertical?

Horizontal.

>> We've added some new functionality to the framework.  Specifically, usage 
>> "plans".  Among other things, Person now has an optional 'plan' relationship 
>> to a Plan entity.  Here's the rub: some apps will want to use this feature, 
>> and others won't.  What I would like to avoid is making _any_ changes to the 
>> applications that _don't_ want to use this.  
> 
> Then  don't modify Person.
> 
>> If I merge this feature back into the trunk, legacy apps are going to break 
>> immediately, because FooPerson isn't going to have a 'plan' attribute that 
>> it should be inheriting from Person.  At runtime there's going to be a 
>> missing table column as soon as I fetch a FooPerson, and at development 
>> time, every time I touch the model or generate the EO classes, the unwanted 
>> 'plan' attribute is going to be added.
> 
> Which is why you don't want to modify Person (^_^)

I couldn't see a way around it until..

> Two strategies come to mind:
> 
> 1) Add a new Person subclass that has a plan relationship and extend that for 
> the subclasses that need to have a plan.
> 
> 2) If you don't need a real relationship on the person class, add a detached 
> table with a relationship to person and plan.  Make a unique index on the 
> person column. That will give you either 0 or 1 plans per person without 
> needing to modify the person entity at all.

Thanks for those ideas.  1 sounds the easier of the two—I'll start there.


-- 
Paul.

http://logicsquad.net/


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to